he parrot was average--brightly feathered, bursting with song at
inopportune times, keen eye watching--except existing purely in illusion.
The droppings to be cleaned, feeding, bouts of moroseness when he refused to
say hello, the three months it took to teach him to whistle the theme to
"The Good, the Bad and the Ugly"--all equal in substance to the illusory
bird. What had seemed great amounts of feed to go through had in fact been
seeds and pellets set out for that lack which the parrot represented, and
rather than being consumed they were thrown away each day and set out again
anew. The parrot made others believe he ate too much when in fact he ate no
more than any other phantom creation could on the best of days. When
visitors arrived they appreciated this unique pet, especially those allergic
to dogs or cats, because on his perch opposite the television he offended no
one, though often he sang and squawked through mornings songs of notes
haphazardly coupled and off-key. Those with an ideological aversion to
animals confined as pets--especially jungle creatures who should be free to
hunt and be preyed upon according to the fortunes of the food chain--lost
the hard edge to their belief under the grinning vigilance of the
African grey, and spent hours gently teasing him, watching his perceptive
black bead eyes, extending a finger only to retract it as the beak made a
move to bite. The parrot had his favourites, those he would sing for or even
let stroke his feathers with one finger, but he did not care for children as
much because sometimes they tried to poke him with long objects when others
were out of the room, and some merely looked at him suspiciously from afar.
One girl, shrewder that the rest, once even said, "But it's not real!
There's nothing there!" and the bird was forced to change the texture of her
statement so the others heard it as, "But he has no meal! It isn't fair!",
so that the feed tray was again replenished and the group could happily
watch him eat while the girl, arms folded, watched disdainfully as grown people gathered
together in the act of feeding an illusion. The owners
of the bird, a childless but happily married urban couple, were proud of
their whistling social investment; dinner parties had never been so
successful or their circle of friends so extensive.
But one day one of the visiting children must have undone the parrot's ankle
chain, and the window had been open, and the adults gathered in the kitchen
for the dramatic unveiling of a stroganoff, and the bird had flown. The
distraught couple roamed the rooms and scanned the skies for a trace of their
beloved pet, but the dinner had to begin under an air of tragedy and
tension. The couple interrogated the two children, a boy and girl, accusing
them of social sabotage, which was deeply resented by the parents who had
faith their children would know the difference between right and wrong
enough not to tamper with the birds of others. No, they reasoned, this must
have happened through some fault of the bird's owners, who were taking out
on defenseless children a frustration at long-harbored personal
inadequacies.
When the party left and the couple was alone with neither pet nor air of
triumph at another night of social fulfillment, they somberly cleared dishes
and on the balcony under a clear night sky held each other consolingly,
thinking that nothing would ever be able to replace what they had lost.
Ezra Kyrill Erker has published poetry in British journals (Stand, Envoi, Orbis, Psychopoetica, etc.), translations of German political
theory (he was born in Berlin), and educational materials (he teaches medicine
and English at a national university in Japan).
Back to the Top
Issue 13 |
Archives |
Theory |
Links |
Guidelines
Previous |
Next
editors@cafeirreal.com
story copyright by author 2005 all rights reserved